Mohammad Mostafa'i: woman stoned threshold Tabriz Blog defense without Dfamhmd Mostafa'i (a lawyer and human rights) Friday August 1388 Sakineh Mohammadi second term of four years the central prison of Tabriz to take over his dispute with his wife for years and have reasons, including poverty and lack of attention to his wife with a man asked to communicate with and after a while on Molla trial is being subject. On 25/2/1385 Branch 101 Osku criminal court in the Eastern Azerbaijan suit No. 27/2/85 -114 to charge those having liaison with Mr. Nasser Ali tolerate and ninety-nine lashes punished condemning plans. Sentence, after the finality of Enforcement and penalties set forth in one suit, is executed. On 19/6/1385, while the judgments issued by the above mentioned credit Mkhtvmh matter was found, the Sixth Criminal Court Branch East Azerbaijan, again While first-degree murder case to examine the late Abraham Qadrzadh be charged the alleged adultery Sakineh knowledge and without evidence to prove claims about his guilt on this charge in accordance with Article 83, after the Islamic Penal Code should suffice. Despite the denial of the crime Sakineh adultery in the last hearing and defend his statement that all contents of previous sessions of interrogation and asked to lie as the other accused is Ali foot case hearing is set. Said that many people have adultery. Elm Court, citing the judge only, without a clear direction and is well-founded judgments and out documented Sakineh Mohammadi stoning to death should be issued. Based on a fundamental and hearing the judges comments minorities sentenced to stoning in this case: - According to Ms. Sakineh Mohammadi suit 27/2/85-114 Branch No. 101 Osku criminal charges of having a liaison tolerance has been sentenced to 99 lashes and not violated when the sentence can not be re-prosecuted Ms. Mohammadi and other words will not be one person to a crime because the prosecution and once again, if proof was prosecuted defendant and the prosecution of this case does not justify legal . Two of the branch names of advisors and Gentlemen Kazemi Hmdalhy opinion of innocence and had expressly delegated to announce that: «in case of adultery a crime because no proof and gnomon